RandyMelchert.com

December 1, 2009

We’re getting closer to Free Speech!

Filed under: Campaign Finance, Legislative Requests — randallmelchert @ 12:22 am

As I ranted earlier, (and even made WisOpinion for my rant), the state election laws are horribly out of date in regards to independent expenditures. I won’t rehash my personal story but suffice it to say if you spend $30 supporting a candidate you can be in trouble if you don’t fill out half a dozen forms.

Unless, you are willing to take them to court:

In Spring, 2008 the following events occured:

Swaffer is a resident of the Town of Whitewater, a so-called “dry” town in Walworth County, Wisconsin. On April 1, 2008, residents of the Town of Whitewater were asked to vote, via referendum, on whether to turn the town wet and allow liquor sales and licensing of liquor vendors. Swaffer alleges that he opposed the referendum, and wanted to mail postcards to fellow residents urging them to vote against the liquor proposals on the April 1, 2008, ballot.2 Swaffer also wanted to make yard signs advocating against passage of the referendum. Plaintiffs estimated the cost of producing and distributing the postcards and signs to be approximately five hundred dollars. Plaintiff Rasmussen, a resident of nearby Waterford, Wisconsin, alleges that he sought to contribute to Swaffer’s effort to offset the cost of producing and distributing the postcards and signs.

On March 16th, 2009, John Swaffer, a Town of Whitewater resident won a summary judgment against the Government Accountability Board (GAB), because the GAB requirements were unconstitutional.

Now, in a letter from the GAB to State Sen. Lena Taylor, chair of the Senate Committee on Campaign Finance (and other stuff), we find that “The most recent litigation cost the state $70,000 in legal fees paid to the plaintiffs.”

The GAB is seeking to raise the threshold from $25 to $750, before reports are due.  This is a good move in my opinion, as it lifts restrictions on free (political) speech.

They have submitted to the Legislative Reference Bureau bill LRB 3859-1, that will codify this into state law.

November 16, 2009

New State Motto

Filed under: Legislative Requests — randallmelchert @ 8:58 pm

Now that we have a state microbe to fit our cow stereotype, maybe we should work on a new state motto to fit our other stereotype, like:

April 2, 2009

Whatever happened to free (political) speech?

Filed under: Legislative Requests — randallmelchert @ 11:44 pm

Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay would likely be tried in Wisconsin if they tried to pull the stunt they pulled after the Revolutionary War. No not the dueling that ended Hamilton’s life. I’m talking about something far more serious. Anonymous political tracts.

If they tried to spend more than $20 promoting their views and advocating for a Federalist candidate and did not fill out forms EB-1, EB-2 (along with Schedule 1-A and 2-A, and that’s just assuming they didn’t work in concert with each other), EB-6 (notarized), and EB-7, they would be in serious trouble. Specifically they would face the penalties of ss. 11.06, 11.61, and 11.66.

Not making a whole lot of sense? Well – I’m feeling a bit agitated that I need to do more than tell people who I’m voting for (Rose & Randy) so I figure I got some signs leftover from last September – what can I do with them? I know – I could go to Kinko’s and run off some posters and slap them on there and put it out on the road. Voter turnout is probably only 20% (maybe higher if Jefferson Davis can scare enough people into showing up at the polls! :-) ) and no one seems to know what the DPI and Supreme Court do, so I figure I will be a committee of one and take the action upon myself to share my views with my community.

But first I must fill out, read the instructions to figure out how to fill out four separate forms (hopefully I filled out the right ones, assuming I can even find the right forms (show me where EB-6 and EB-7 are on the GAB’s list of Campaign Finance Forms!). Now I’m not doing a multi-million dollar television buy. Looking at the quote I’m just over $300.

For the next round of so-called ethics legislation (maybe the Legal Bailout Bill would be a better name for ethics reform – all it does is guarantee job security to the next generation of Law School Alumni {in the interest of full disclosure I am not opposed to attorneys, I have been accepted to law school this fall and am looking forward to it})… but can we have some simpler forms? Since everything today requires paperwork, I won’t ask for the right to truly “Free Speech.” Just a simple brief ONLINE questionnaire – certifying I’m spending under $1,000, maybe ask my name, address, who its for. As opposed to filling out EB-1/2/6/7.

UPDATE: There is one group of people in America who do have the right to anonymous free speech… just stumbled across this while looking through the Wisconsin Administrative Code:

A minor political party that historically has been the object of harassment by government officials and private parties cannot be required to disclose the identities of contributors and recipients of campaign disbursements. Brown v. Socialist Workers ‘74 Campaign Comm. 459 U.S. 87 (1982).”

Interesting, kinda like how the Amish don’t have to pay Social Security

February 18, 2009

Armchair Urban Planner: Capitol Drive Roundabout?

Filed under: Legislative Requests — randallmelchert @ 9:18 pm

What things would I want to change if I was a bureaucrat in the Transportation Department?

For one, I would be interested in the feasibility of a roundabout at the Capitol Drive and US-45 intersection (2nd tier). As an armchair urban planner, here’s my thoughts:

We have a three tier intersection – top tier is non-stop US-45 North-South. Bottom tier is non-stop Capitol Drive East-West. The middle tier is the 4 stop lights that control access between the roads.

  • Eastbound Capitol -> Southbound US-45 – direct onramp
  • Eastbound Capitol -> Northbound US-45 – stop lights
  • Westbound Capitol -> Northbound US-45 – direct onramp
  • Westbound Capitol -> Southbound US-45 – stop lights
  • Northbound Capitol -> Eastbound Capitol – direct offramp
  • Northbound Capitol -> Westbound Capitol – stop lights
  • Southbound Capitol -> Westbound Capitol – direct offramp
  • Southbound Capitol -> Eastbound Capitol – stop lights

Could we convert the stop light intersection into a Roundabout? Although they are controversial – Oconomowoc has added one recently… In this case it is already designed for a roundabout…

Blog at WordPress.com.